Summary
A researcher submitting to ICML reported that a reviewer made a false claim in their rebuttal acknowledgement, stating the paper's method performed worse than baselines under specific hyperparameter settings. The author asserts this claim is unsupported by the paper's comprehensive comparisons and is seeking advice on how to address this issue. This highlights a potential problem with reviewer integrity or thoroughness in academic publishing.
Continue Reading
Explore related coverage about community news and adjacent AI developments: [r/ML] [D] MYTHOS-INVERSION STRUCTURAL AUDIT, [r/LocalLLaMA] karpathy / autoresearch, [r/ML] [R] Agentic AI and Occupational Displacement: A Multi-Regional Task Exposure Analysis (236 occupations, 5 US metros), [r/ML] Building behavioural response models of public figures using Brain scan data (Predict their next move using psychological modelling) [P].
Related Articles
- [r/ML] [D] MYTHOS-INVERSION STRUCTURAL AUDIT
March 29, 2026
- [r/LocalLLaMA] karpathy / autoresearch
March 10, 2026
- [r/ML] [R] Agentic AI and Occupational Displacement: A Multi-Regional Task Exposure Analysis (236 occupations, 5 US metros)
April 7, 2026
- [r/ML] Building behavioural response models of public figures using Brain scan data (Predict their next move using psychological modelling) [P]
April 5, 2026
Comments
Sign in to leave a comment.