[r/ML] [D] Reported our meta-reviewer in this ARR cycle — no response yet. Should we commit to ACL or should we go with March 2026 cycle with explaining how meta reviews are wrong in revision doc?

Summary

A research team reported a meta-reviewer in the ARR cycle but has not received a response, creating uncertainty as the ACL commitment deadline approaches. They are deliberating whether to commit to ACL 2026 without a resolution or to wait for a future cycle, questioning the typical response time and guarantee for such reports.

Continue Reading

Explore related coverage about community news and adjacent AI developments: [r/ML] [D] MYTHOS-INVERSION STRUCTURAL AUDIT, [r/LocalLLaMA] karpathy / autoresearch, [r/ML] [R] Agentic AI and Occupational Displacement: A Multi-Regional Task Exposure Analysis (236 occupations, 5 US metros), [r/ML] Building behavioural response models of public figures using Brain scan data (Predict their next move using psychological modelling) [P].

Related Articles

• [r/ML] [D] MYTHOS-INVERSION STRUCTURAL AUDIT

  March 29, 2026

• [r/LocalLLaMA] karpathy / autoresearch

  March 10, 2026

• [r/ML] [R] Agentic AI and Occupational Displacement: A Multi-Regional Task Exposure Analysis (236 occupations, 5 US metros)

  April 7, 2026

• [r/ML] Building behavioural response models of public figures using Brain scan data (Predict their next move using psychological modelling) [P]

  April 5, 2026