Summary
A researcher submitting to IJCAI reports being sabotaged by a reviewer who allegedly made false claims about the paper's content and demanded extra experiments and citations in violation of conference policy. The reviewer's actions suggest a lack of thorough reading and potential malicious intent. The researcher is seeking guidance on how to address this issue, including contacting the Program Committee.
Editorial note
AI Dose summarizes public reporting and links to original sources when they are available. Review the Editorial Policy, Disclaimer, or Contact page if you need to flag a correction or understand how this site handles sources.
Continue Reading
Explore related coverage about community news and adjacent AI developments: [r/ML] [D] MYTHOS-INVERSION STRUCTURAL AUDIT, [r/LocalLLaMA] karpathy / autoresearch, [HN] Show HN: FlipAEO – Get your SaaS cited by Perplexity and AI search, [r/ML] You can decompose models into a graph database [N].
Related Articles
- [r/ML] [D] MYTHOS-INVERSION STRUCTURAL AUDIT
March 29, 2026
- [r/LocalLLaMA] karpathy / autoresearch
March 10, 2026
- [HN] Show HN: FlipAEO – Get your SaaS cited by Perplexity and AI search
April 15, 2026
- [r/ML] You can decompose models into a graph database [N]
April 15, 2026
Next read
[r/ML] [D] MYTHOS-INVERSION STRUCTURAL AUDIT
Stay with the thread by reading one adjacent story before leaving this update.
Comments
Sign in to leave a comment.