Summary
An r/ML user expresses frustration with the ICML review process, detailing how a reviewer lowered their paper's score to 2 by introducing a new issue post-rebuttal, which was originally dismissed by another reviewer. The user also notes that a 4.2 average score is only considered top 40% by "Paper Co-Pilot," highlighting the competitive nature of submissions.
Editorial note
AI Dose summarizes public reporting and links to original sources when they are available. Review the Editorial Policy, Disclaimer, or Contact page if you need to flag a correction or understand how this site handles sources.
Continue Reading
Explore related coverage about community news and adjacent AI developments: [r/ML] [D] MYTHOS-INVERSION STRUCTURAL AUDIT, [r/LocalLLaMA] karpathy / autoresearch, [HN] Show HN: Ship of Theseus License, [r/ML] [R] Agentic AI and Occupational Displacement: A Multi-Regional Task Exposure Analysis (236 occupations, 5 US metros).
Related Articles
Next read
[r/ML] [D] MYTHOS-INVERSION STRUCTURAL AUDIT
Stay with the thread by reading one adjacent story before leaving this update.
Comments
Sign in to leave a comment.