0
Likes
0
Saves
Back to updates

[r/ML] What is the scientific value of administering the standard Rorschach test to LLMs when the training data is almost certainly contaminated? (R) + [D]

Impact: 5/10
Swipe left/right

Summary

A recent paper administered standard Rorschach inkblot tests to multimodal LLMs like GPT-4o, Grok 3, and Gemini 2.0, analyzing their responses for "perceptual styles" and content themes using the Exner Comprehensive System. However, the methodological validity of this research is heavily questioned due to the high likelihood of training data contamination, which could render the results unreliable.

Editorial note

AI Dose summarizes public reporting and links to original sources when they are available. Review the Editorial Policy, Disclaimer, or Contact page if you need to flag a correction or understand how this site handles sources.

Continue Reading

Explore related coverage about community news and adjacent AI developments: [r/ML] [D] MYTHOS-INVERSION STRUCTURAL AUDIT, [r/LocalLLaMA] karpathy / autoresearch, [HN] $38k AWS Bedrock bill caused by a simple prompt caching miss, [r/ML] How do you test AI agents in production? The unpredictability is overwhelming.[D].

Related Articles

Next read

[r/ML] [D] MYTHOS-INVERSION STRUCTURAL AUDIT

Stay with the thread by reading one adjacent story before leaving this update.

Comments

Sign in to leave a comment.

Loading comments...