[HN] Why did Harvey choose a top-down enterprise GTM while Cursor went bottom-up?

Summary

This discussion compares the Go-To-Market strategies of Harvey, an AI tool for lawyers, and Cursor, an AI coding assistant. While Cursor uses a bottom-up, easily accessible model, Harvey employs a top-down enterprise approach, making it difficult for smaller entities to access. The core inquiry is why Harvey chose this strategy, potentially due to underlying LLM capabilities or cost constraints.

Continue Reading

Explore related coverage about community news and adjacent AI developments: [r/ML] [D] MYTHOS-INVERSION STRUCTURAL AUDIT, [r/LocalLLaMA] karpathy / autoresearch, [r/ML] [R] Agentic AI and Occupational Displacement: A Multi-Regional Task Exposure Analysis (236 occupations, 5 US metros), [r/ML] Building behavioural response models of public figures using Brain scan data (Predict their next move using psychological modelling) [P].

Related Articles

• [r/ML] [D] MYTHOS-INVERSION STRUCTURAL AUDIT

  March 29, 2026

• [r/LocalLLaMA] karpathy / autoresearch

  March 10, 2026

• [r/ML] [R] Agentic AI and Occupational Displacement: A Multi-Regional Task Exposure Analysis (236 occupations, 5 US metros)

  April 7, 2026

• [r/ML] Building behavioural response models of public figures using Brain scan data (Predict their next move using psychological modelling) [P]

  April 5, 2026